Scientific understanding of the myriad of pathways by which antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emerges and spread is still in its infancy, however, mounting evidence that food systems may be a major conduit of AMR, point to a greater need for vigilance over the way antibiotics are used on farms.
More research needed to mitigate farm-driven antimicrobial resistance
©budabar via 123RF
The global use of synthetic products to indiscriminately kill bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi in agricultural and food systems requires a concerted effort to map, understand and mitigate the risks of AMR, according to Drivers, Dynamics and Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animal Production.
AMR may be a natural genomic process for bacteria, but it was “very rare in clinical isolates predating the introduction of antibiotics,” FAO’s new report notes. As foods from around the globe are today frequently contaminated with antibiotic resistant E. coli and Salmonella, “measures which encourage the prudent use of antimicrobials are likely to be extremely useful in reducing the emergence and spread of AMR,” the 67-page technical report says.
The report, launched during World Antibiotic Awareness Week, a joint initiative by FAO, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) to raise awareness of one of the biggest threats to global health, summarises the magnitude of AMR in the food and especially the livestock sector, which is expected to account for two-thirds of future growth in antimicrobial usage.
More research recommeded
The report’s key recommendations are the need to support and pursue more research – involving both molecular sequencing and epidemiological analyses – into factors influencing how and why resistant bacteria become incorporated into human and animal gut microbiomes as well as the need to create standardised monitoring procedures and databases so that adequate risk-assessment models can be built.
Use of antimicrobials solely to promote animal growth should be phased out. Instead, alternatives to antibiotics to enhance animal health should be more vigorously pursued.
Use of antimicrobials solely to promote animal growth should be phased out. Instead, alternatives to antibiotics to enhance animal health – including enhanced vaccination programmes – should be more vigorously pursued. Antimicrobial residues in the environment, especially in water sources, should be tracked in the same way as other hazardous substances, the report urges.
“Given our current limited knowledge of transmission pathways, options to mitigate the global spread of AMR involve controlling its emergence in various environments, and minimising the opportunities for AMR to spread along what may be the most important routes,” the report says.
What we are learning
While cautious about how much remains unknown, the authors – experts from the Royal Veterinary College in London and FAO experts led by Juan Lubroth – highlight compelling evidence of the scale of the threat.
For instance, US honeybees have different gut bacteria than found elsewhere, reflecting use of tetracycline in hives since the 1950s. Fish farms in the Baltic Sea show fewer AMR genes than aquaculture systems in China, which are now reservoirs of genes encoding resistance to quinolones – a critical human medicine whose use has grown because of increasing resistance to older antimicrobials such as tetracycline.
The recent detection of resistance to colistin, until recently considered a last-ditch antibiotic in human medicine, in several countries, also underscores the need to scrutinise livestock practices, as the drug has been used for decades in pigs, poultry, sheep, cattle and farmed fish.
Sizing up mitigation options
The report focuses on livestock because future demand for animal-based protein is expected to accelerate intensive operations – where animals in close contact multiply the potential incidence of AMR pathogens.
Poultry, the world’s primary animal protein source, followed by pork, are important food-based vehicles of AMR transmission to humans. Cases in Tanzania and Pakistan also demonstrate the risk of AMR coming from integrated aquaculture systems that use farm and poultry waste as fish food.
High biosecurity may reduce AMU requirements, thus reducing the risk of emergent resistances. Likewise, prevention of food contamination and removal of bacteria from the food chain can be very effective in reducing AMR transmission. A recent study of Nebraska cattle found strains of E.coli on all hides, but on only 0.5 percent of carcasses and none in the meat headed for retail consumers. Environmental vectors – including wind, soil, waste, and water – may prove more difficult AMR transmission pathways to control.
As animals metabolise only a small fraction of the antimicrobial agents they ingest, the spread of antimicrobials from animal waste is an important concern.
While smallholder systems may rely less on antimicrobials, they often use over-the-counter drugs without veterinary advice. Inappropriate, sub-lethal, dosing promotes genetic and phenotypic variability among the exposed bacteria that survive.
Collectively, while there are still many gaps in our understanding about AMR, evidence about AMR in food systems is growing and points to the need for immediate action. Working collaboratively across all sectors and aspects of food production, from farm to table, will provide an essential contribution to an integrated one-health approach to combat AMR